2008 EPAS Handbook old

  • Release Date06/30/2009
Show Table of Contents
2.4.7. COA Decisions for Commissioner Visit III
Search

After reviewing the program’s Benchmark III, the Benchmark III Review Brief submitted by the commissioner who conducted Commission Visit III (including the commissioner’s recommendation) and the program’s response to Benchmark III Review Brief COA makes one of four decisions:

  1. Grant a Third Year of Candidacy Status. COA finds that the program is in compliance with Benchmark III and grants the program a third year in candidacy. The decision letter instructs the program to prepare Benchmark IV and a draft self-study in preparation for its Commissioner Visit IV. A commissioner will contact the program to arrange the visit.
  2. Defer a Decision on a Third Year of Candidacy Status and Request Clarifying Information. COA decides to defer a decision when the program’s documentation is insufficient to make a decision. A deferral is for one meeting only. Before the next commission meeting the program is expected to submit the documentation or clarification necessary for COA to make a decision.
  3. Order an Additional Year of Candidacy. COA finds that the program’s Benchmark III needs further development and needs an additional year. The program should revise Benchmark III for an additional commissioner visit. A commissioner will contact the
    program to arrange the visit.
  4. Remove from Candidacy Status. COA agrees with the commissioner’s recommendation that the program is not in compliance with one or more areas of Benchmark III and removes the program from candidacy. The program has two options in response to the decision: (1) to accept the decision and apply for candidacy by submitting a Benchmark I document or (2) to appeal by requesting a reconsideration of the decision. The program must notify its accreditation specialist in writing which option it intends to pursue. If the program accepts the decision it may submit a Benchmark I document and apply for candidacy status no earlier than the second COA meeting following the one at which COA made its decision.
Document Date: June 30, 2009
Show Table of Contents